Effectiveness of non-surgical management in rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy (the effect trial): protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy (RCCT) involves calcific deposits in the rotator cuff. Non-surgical interventions such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation of calcific tendinopathy (US-PICT) are recommended for its early management. Exercise therapy (ET) has shown to be an effective intervention for people with rotator cuff tendinopathy, but it has not been formally tested in RCCT. The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of an ET programme with ESWT and US-PICT in people with RCCT. As a secondary aim, this study aims to describe the natural history of RCCT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised, single-blinded four-group clinical trial will be conducted. Adults from 30 to 75 years diagnosed with RCCT who accomplish eligibility criteria will be recruited. Participants (n=116) will be randomised into four groups: ET group will receive a 12-week rehabilitation programme; ESWT group will receive four sessions with 1 week rest between sessions during 1 month; US-PICT group will receive two sessions with 3 months of rest between sessions; and (actual) wait-and-see group will not receive any intervention during the 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome will be shoulder pain assessed with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months from baseline. The primary analysis will be performed at 12 months from baseline. Secondary outcomes will include pain, range of motion, patient satisfaction and imaging-related variables. Moreover, the following psychosocial questionnaires with their corresponding outcome measure will be assessed: Central Sensitization Inventory (symptoms related to central sensitization); Pain Catastrophizing Scale (pain catastrophizing); Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia 11 items (fear of movement); Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (fear avoidance behaviour); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety and depression); Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (sleep quality); and the EuroQol-5D (quality of life). An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed to reduce the risk of bias using a worst-case and best-case scenario analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics committee approval for this study has been obtained (reference number: 1718862). The results of the main trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05478902.

Effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in treatment of upper and lower limb tendinopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tendinopathy is caused by repetitive motion, excessive stress on the tendon, overstretch, and motion past the critical angle of rotation or translation. There are various treatment options available for tendinitis, including those affecting both the upper and lower limbs and those of calcific and non-calcific types. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: Few reviews have analyzed the efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) in treating upper and lower limb tendinopathies while considering calcific and non-calcific-type tendinitis. This paper provides a review and meta-analysis on Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), which compared results from a group undergoing ESWT treatment to another group under different treatments. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) databases for articles published up to January 2022. The reference lists of identified articles were further scanned. Twenty-two studies were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed no difference in pain reduction in ESWT when compared with a comparison group at 4 (p = 0.26) and 12 weeks (p = 0.33). There were no differences in DASH scores at 12 months between the two groups (p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) is effective when used to treat lower limb and calcific tendinitis. It does not yield any better results than other treatment options in managing upper limb tendinopathies and non-calcific tendinopathies.

Bibliometric analysis of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for tendinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a mature, conservative treatment modality for tendinopathy. Although many relevant studies have been conducted, systematic bibliometric studies are lacking. This study aimed to identify trends and hotspots in the treatment of tendinopathy using ESWT. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on ESWT for tendinopathy using the Web of Science Core Collection with a search period of 2002 to 2022. Of 559 identified studies, 276 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using CiteSpace software. RESULTS: The results showed that from 2002 to 2022, the publication rate of literature on ESWT for tendinopathy was generally increasing. Research hotspots, such as tendinopathy and calcific rotator cuff deposits, began earlier but continued to receive scholarly attention. Research on animal models and molecular mechanisms has progressed slowly in this field. The combined or comparative effectiveness of injectable and supplement-based treatments with ESWT is a popular research topic. CONCLUSION: Pain management in patients with tendinopathy has received considerable attention. Simultaneously, more clinical indicators of energy levels and pulse parameters during ESWT are needed to provide more scientific and accurate treatment for patients.

[Clinical application study of multiple small-diameter drilling combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) under C-arm positioning in the treatment of early femoral head necrosis].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the therapeutic effect of multiple small diameter drilling combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) under C-arm X-raylocalization in patients with early osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). METHODS: A total of 106 cases of early ONFH patients admitted from May 2015 to May 2017 were retrospectively selected as the study subjects. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into observation group and control group, 53 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with multiple small-diameter drilling combined with ESWT under C-arm positioning in the observation group, including 41 males and 12 females with an age of (45.85±6.01) years old (22 to 70 years old);and the control group was treated with ESWT, including 34 males and 19 females with an age of (45.12±5.83) years old(20 to 68 years old) in the control group. The modified Harris hip scores(mHHS), visual analog scale(VAS), hip flexion range, hip abduction and adduction range, ONFH area ratio and clinical efficacy were compared between twe groups before and after treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw a survival curve to compare the femoral head survival rate between two groups during the 3-year follow-up period after treatment. RESULTS: There were no complications such as poor wound healing and infection. All of 106 patients were followed up for 28 to 36 months with an average of (31.06±4.28) months. MHHS score, hip flexion range and hip abduction and adduction range in the observation group were increased from (63.85±5.42) scores, (23.79±2.21) °, (32.40±4.19) ° before treatment to (85.51±5.69) scores, (34.65±2.73)°, (43.32±5.71)° at 2 years after treatment, respectively(P<0.05). The above indicators in the control group increased from (64.73±5.64)°, (23.82±2.18)°, (32.45±4.13)° before treatment to (81.65±5.48) scores, (32.79±2.87)°, (39.75±5.68)°at two years after treatment, respectively(P<0.05). VAS score and ONFH area ratio in the observation group decreased from (5.76±1.41) scores and (35.07±4.96)% before treatment to (3.39±1.02) scores and (22.04±3.23)% at 2 years after treatment, respectively(P<0.05). The above indicatiors in control group decreased from (5.73±1.45) scores and (35.24±5.18)% before treatment to (4.43±1.21) scores and (28.32±3.76)% at 2 years after treatment, respectively(P<0.05), and the improvement in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). At 3 years after treatment, the femoral head survival rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Multiple small diameter drilling combined with ESWT under C-arm positioning can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients with early ONFH, relieve pain and improve clinical efficacy.

Which Treatment Method Is Better in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, or Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning?

BACKGROUND: Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a common disease that has various treatment options. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three of these options: corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL). METHODS: The records of 229 patients treated with CSI (n = 81), ESWT (n = 76), or RTL (n = 72) were retrospectively analyzed. Visual analog scale scores, patient satisfaction-related success rates, repeated treatment rates, and initial treatment change rates were compared. RESULTS: Mean ± SD follow-up was 19.0 ± 4.5 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, mean visual analog scale scores (before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12), patient satisfaction and success rates (at months 6 and 12), and repeated treatment and initial treatment change rates were similar between treatment groups. No complications were observed after the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: All three options-CSI, ESWT, and RTL-were found to be safe and effective in treating CPF, with similar outcomes up to 1 year. Use of CSIs is advantageous because it is more accessible than the other treatments. Similarly, the noninvasive nature of ESWT is glaring among other minimally invasive options. Therefore, the first-line treatment modality of CPF can be CSI or ESWT, depending on the patient's and physician's joint preference; RTL treatment should be tried in patients who do not respond to these treatments.

Comparing the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and myofascial release therapy in chronic pelvic pain syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome is a highly prevalent syndrome. Previous studies showed that extracorporeal shockwave therapy and myofascial release therapy could improve the quality of life in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Theoretically, combined therapy with extracorporeal shockwave therapy and myofascial release therapy will likely have significant advantages in treating CP/CPPS. We, therefore, present a protocol for conducting a well-designed randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of each therapy. METHODS: The proposed study will be a three-group randomized control trial (RCT) design that includes 150 participants from Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, with equal allocation of participants to the three intervention groups. The study duration will be 8 weeks, which includes a 4-week treatment period and a 4-week follow-up period. The primary outcome will be the changes in surface electromyography (sEMG) assessment and National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The secondary outcomes will include the changes in three-dimensional quantification, shear wave elastography (SWE), and sympathetic skin response (SSR) testing. Assessments will be conducted before the intervention (T0), before the 5th intervention (T1), immediately after the 8th intervention (T2), and the 4th week after the end of the 8th intervention (T3). DISCUSSION: This trial will compare the differences in efficacy between single extracorporeal shockwave therapy, single myofascial release therapy, and combined therapy to select the most appropriate treatment option for patients with CP/CPPS. The possible pathogenesis of CP/CPPS would also be analyzed by comparing the intercorrelation between each objective and subjective measurement (NIH-CPSI score, sEMG, SWE, SSR). TRIAL REGISTRATION: The name of the registry: Extracorporeal Shockwave and Myofascial Release Therapy in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05659199. Date of registration: December 2022.

Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome and Acquired Premature Ejaculation Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patients with acquired premature ejaculation (APE) due to chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). METHOD: Patients with APE due to CP/CPPS between January 2020 and June 2022 were included in the study. Demographic data of the patients were recorded, and the degree of their symptoms was evaluated with the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT), and Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). The international prostate symptom index (IPSS) was also used for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and the international erectile function index-erectile function (IIEF-EF) was used to evaluate erectile functions. All patients received treatment with the Medispec Bold Li-ESWT device without using any anesthesia method (12 sessions). The changes in the symptom scores of the patients were evaluated before the treatment and at the 3rd month after the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 43.75 ± 12.03 (20-55), and the mean BMI was 23.58 ± 7.61 (18.03-35.98) kg/m2. The patients' estimated mean intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) before ESWT was 37.98 ± 21.87 s. After a total of 12 sessions of ESWT, the IIEF-EF, IPSS, NIH-CPSI, and PEP index scores of the patients showed significant improvements (p < 0.001 for each). The IELT mean increased to 74.81 ± 46.79 s (p < 0.001). Posttreatment IELT fold increase was determined as 3.25 ± 1.72 fold. A highly significant positive correlation (p = 0.032; r = 0.839) was found between the CPSI score difference and the posttreatment PEP index score. CONCLUSION: Li-ESWT treatment is an effective and safe treatment with positive effects on both LUTS and premature ejaculation in patients with APE symptoms due to CP/CPPS. Patients who benefit from CP treatment also have longer IELT times.

Assessment of common extensor tendon vascularization using superb microvascular imaging: a potential tool in the evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound effectiveness in lateral epicondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Lateral epicondylitis, also known as tennis elbow, is the most common elbow pain in the adult age group. PURPOSE: To evaluate common extensor tendon (CET) vascularity with superb microvascular imaging (SMI) before and after extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasound (US) treatment in patients with lateral epycondylitis and to compare the effects of two different treatments on tendon vascularity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with lateral epycondylitis were divided into two groups; 30 patients were treated with ESWT (group 1) and 30 patients were treated with therapeutic US (group 2). We performed a high-frequency (14-MHz) linear array transducer to evaluate tendon anatomy and vascularity before and after treatment in both groups. RESULTS: The decrease in Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) score after treatment was statistically significant compared to pre-treatment for both groups (P < 0.001). Likewise, the decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment was statistically significant compared to pre-treatment for both groups (P < 0.001). A significant difference was found between the CET SMI values of group 1 and group 2 after treatment, according to the chi-square test (P < 0.001). In the post-treatment VAS and PRTEE comparison of both groups, the score reduction in group 1 was higher than in group 2, and this decrease was statistically significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We can evaluate CET vascularization with the SMI method as a new potential diagnostic tool in comparing the effectiveness of different treatments in cases of lateral epicondylitis.

The therapeutic effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with Kinesio Tape on plantar fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) combined with Kinesio Tape (KT) for plantar fasciitis (PF) is lacking in the literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of ESWT combined with KT on foot pain and function in patients with PF based on ultrashort wave therapy and stretching. METHODS: A total of 91 patients with PF were randomly divided into the ESWT group (ETG, n= 23), KT group (KTG, n= 23), combined treatment group (CTG, n= 22) and control group (CG, n= 23). Herein, changes in visual analysis scale (VAS) score, plantar fascia thickness (PFT) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were examined. RESULTS: The groups were compared after 4 weeks and the results showed that the VAS scores of ETG, KTG and CTG were significantly smaller than that of CG (P< 0.05). In addition, the VAS score of CTG was significantly smaller than that of KTG (P< 0.001). Meanwhile, the AOFAS scores of ETG and CTG were significantly greater than that of CG (P< 0.001). Moreover, the AOFAS score of CTG was significantly greater than those of ETG and KTG (P< 0.01). Comparisons within groups were also conducted at weeks 0 and 4 and the results showed that the VAS scores of ETG, KTG and CTG significantly decreased (P< 0.001); the PFT of ETG and CTG significantly decreased (P< 0.05); and the AOFAS score of ETG, KTG and CTG significantly increased (P< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on ultrashort wave therapy and stretching, ESWT and KT therapy could improve the foot pain and function of patients with PF, and the combined modality therapy is more effective. ESWT and combined treatment has a positive effect on patients' PFT. However, single KT treatment has a limited effect on PFT.

Low-intensity laser diode plus extracorporeal shock wave therapy: a new treatment strategy in the management of Peyronie's disease.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of extra corporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) administration compared with ESWT plus a low-intensity laser diode therapy (LILDT) in the management of Peyronie's disease (PD) stable stage. METHODS: In this study, 214 patients affected by PD in stable stage (≥ 12 months), were divided into two groups. Group 1 (G1) counted 111 patients treated only with ESWT; Group 2 (G2) consisted of 103 patients that received ESWT with the same protocol of G1 plus LILDT for six weeks. The patients of both groups were assessed at baseline and follow-up for erectile function, painful erections, penile plaque size and penile curvature. The results were evaluated at baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the treatment. RESULTS: Three months after the treatment in G2 pain in an erection or during intercourse was resolved completely in 78.6% of the patients, whereas in 55.8% cases of G1 (p < 0.003). G2 patients had a reduction of curvature degree after the 3 months treatment (p < 0.002). However, mean plaque size decreased in both groups without statistically differences with baseline values. Mean ± SD IIEF-5 score further improved significantly in the group treated with ESWT plus LILDT (p < 0.001). There were no permanent adverse sequelae after treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an interesting therapeutic strategy when combined to the synergistic action of a shock wave therapy with low-intensity laser therapy on the stable plaques with significant benefits in terms of pain perception, penile curvature and sexual activity.

Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 632 patients.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been widely used for pain control in musculoskeletal disorders. Whether ESWT can relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP) and improve lumbar function is still unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of relevant studies to comprehensively analyse and determine the efficacy and safety of ESWT for chronic low back pain. METHODS: Four databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ESWT for CLBP. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to Cochrane systematic review criteria, relevant data were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. The primary outcomes were pain intensity, disability status, and mental health. The data were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) or weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. If I2 ≥ 50%, a random effects model was applied; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs involving 632 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The ESWT group reported significantly more pain relief than the control group at 4 weeks (WMD = - 1.04; 95% CI = - 1.44 to - 0.65; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (WMD = - 0.85; 95% CI = - 1.30 to - 0.41; P < 0.001). Regarding the dysfunction index, ESWT led to significant improvement in lumbar dysfunction compared with the control group at 4 weeks (WMD = - 4.22; 95% CI = - 7.55 to - 0.89; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (WMD = - 4.51; 95% CI = - 8.58 to - 0.44; P = 0.03). For mental health, there was no significant difference between the ESWT group and the control group after 4 weeks of intervention (SMD = 1.17; 95% CI = - 0.10 to 2.45; P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ESWT provided better pain relief and improved lumbar dysfunction compared with the other interventions included, and no serious adverse effects were found. There was no significant effect of ESWT on the mental health of patients, but we hope to obtain more RCTs for further analysis in the future. Based on the pooled results, we suggest that ESWT is effective and safe for treating chronic low back pain.

Treatment of prostatitis with low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT).

BACKGROUND: Prostatitis is known as the inflammation of the prostate. The treatments of prostatitis are either pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment. However, some of the treatments are not effective and very invasive which can lead to side effects. Thus, low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) is used as an alternative treatment for prostatitis due to its convenient and non-invasive procedure. However, a definite protocol for this treatment is not available due to the variability of the treatment protocols and the lack of research comparing the efficacy of these protocols. OBJECTIVE: To review and compare the efficacy of different LI-ESWT protocols in treating prostatitis. METHODS: The study was performed by comparing the intensity, duration, frequency and combination with different types of pharmacotherapy drugs of the different LI-ESWT protocols from various studies. The finding from various studies which consist of disease improvement and quality of life (QoL) were also presented in this review. RESULT: From the findings, the protocol can be categorized into three different intensities which are at 3000 pulses, < 3000 pulses and > 3000 pulses. Most studies reported that each protocol is very effective and safe to use and can improve CP symptoms, urinary symptoms, erectile function and QoL. It is also found that no complications or adverse effects occur to the patient. CONCLUSION: Most of the LI-ESWT protocols described are safe and effective in treating CP through the absence of treatment-related adverse effects and maintenance of clinical effects.

A Comprehensive Review of the Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Stroke Patients: Balance, Pain, Spasticity.

Stroke remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, with survivors often experiencing impairments in balance, pain, spasticity, and control that limit their ability to perform daily living activities. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a potential treatment modality to improve these outcomes in stroke patients. This review aims to provide a comprehensive examination of the effects of ESWT on stroke patients, focusing on the theoretical background, balance, pain reduction, muscle spasticity and control, and upper and lower extremities. This study reviewed the use of ESWT in treating balance, pain, and spasticity in stroke patients, focusing on articles published in PubMed between January 2003 and January 2023. Systematic reviews related to stroke were used to provide an overview of stroke, and a total of 33 articles related to balance, pain, and spasticity were selected. ESWT has several shock wave generation methods and application methods, and it has been shown to have positive therapeutic effects on various aspects of rehabilitation for stroke patients, such as improving balance, reducing pain, decreasing muscle spasticity and increasing control, and enhancing functional activities of the upper and lower extremities. The efficacy of ESWT may vary depending on the patient's condition, application method, and treatment area. Therefore, it is important to apply ESWT according to the individual characteristics of each patient in clinical practice to maximize its potential benefits.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of delivering extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) to patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). It also aimed to explore any potential clinical effect of ESWT on wound healing and investigate whether ESWT offers any patient-reported benefits. METHOD: In this single-centre, mixed methods feasibility study, patients with a DFU who met the eligibility criteria underwent ESWT three times over a seven-day period. Primary outcome was feasibility of delivering the intervention. Secondary outcomes included wound size, number of DFUs healed at 12 weeks and quality of life (QoL). Semi-structured interviews explored participants' experience of undergoing ESWT. RESULTS: Of 106 patients screened, 24 (22.6%) were recruited. Following recruitment, two patients were withdrawn from the study with 22 patients included in the final analysis. The mean attendance at clinic was 90.9% and 65.1% for follow-up. The mean score for acceptability and tolerability was 9.86±0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.62-10.01) and 9.15±2.57 (95% CI: 7.87-10.42), respectively. There were no serious adverse events or side-effects. Of the DFUs, 45.5% healed during follow-up and QoL scores improved until eight weeks. Key themes identified from the qualitative interviews were: desire for fast healing; improved QoL; flexibility of new treatments; and accessibility of transport. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that it is possible to recruit and retain patents into a single-arm study of ESWT for DFUs. This study supports development of a large randomised control trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of ESWT for DFU healing.

Radial or Focal Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Real-Life Retrospective Study.

Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is characterized by pain, poor muscle strength of the wrist ex-tensors, and disability. Among the conservative rehabilitative approaches, focal as well as radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), are considered effective in LET management. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of focal (fESWT) and radial (rESWT) in terms of LET symptoms and the strength of wrist extensors, taking into account potential gender differences. This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients with LET treated with ESWT that had received a clinical and functional evaluation, including visuo-analogic scale (VAS), muscle strength using an electronic dynamometer during Cozen's test, and the patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire. Follow-ups were carried out weekly in four visits after enrollment, and at 8 and 12 weeks. During the follow-ups, the VAS score decreased in both treatments, even if patients receiving fESWT reported early pain relief compared to those treated with rESWT (time for treatment p-value < 0.001). Additionally, peak muscle strength increased independently of the device used, and again more rapidly in the fESWT group (time for treatment p-value < 0.001). In the stratified analysis for sex and for the type of ESWT, rESWT appears to be less effective in female participants in terms of mean muscle strength and PRTEE scores, without differences according to the type of device used. The rESWT group reported a higher rate of minor adverse events (i.e., discomfort, p = 0.03) compared to fESWT. Our data suggest that both fESWT and rESWT might be effective in improving LET symptoms, even if the higher rate of painful procedures were reported in patients treated with rESWT.

Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Ischial Apophysitis in Young High-Level Gymnasts.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on ischial apophysitis (IA) in young high-level gymnasts. We hypothesized that ESWT would be safe and effective in alleviating pain. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Funabashi Orthopedic Hospital. PATIENTS: The subjects were 18 high-level gymnasts (mean age of 13 years) with a chief complain of chronic buttock pain diagnosed with IA. INTERVENTIONS: Ten patients received only physiotherapy (PT), whereas 8 received both PT and ESWT to the ischial tuberosity. The basic protocol for ESWT was to use an energy dose of 0.20 mJ/mm 2 or less with 3000 shots per session at 4-week intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We investigated whether PT and ESWT relieved the pain and allowed the patient to return fully to gymnastics. Based on radiographs at the last observation, we examined whether early closure of the apophyseal line of the ischium and around hip joint on the affected side occurred. RESULTS: In the PT group, pain was relieved in 2 of 10 patients. In the ESWT group, pain was relieved and full return to gymnastics was possible in all 8 patients. None of the patients showed early closure of the apophyseal line. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy can be a safe and effective treatment option for IA in young high-level gymnasts.

Efficacies of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Various conservative treatment methods can be administered in the early stages of plantar fasciitis (PF). The aim of the treatment is to enable the patient to return to the physical activity as soon as possible. AIM: In this study it was aimed to compare efficacies of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on patients with PF. DESIGN: A local prospective cross-sectional study SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic of Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine POPULATION: Patients aged 18-70 years, having ongoing heel pain for at least 3 months, and not using oral and/or parenteral corticosteroids in the last 6 months. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with PF included in the current study. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roles and Maudsley Score (RMS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Association Score (AOFAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire were performed for all patients. ESWT and LLLT groups comprised of 22 (55%) and 18 (45%) patients, respectively. RESULTS: We found significant improvements in scores based on the VAS, RMS, AOFAS, FFI in patients with PF and it was sustained for 3 months (p = 0.001, for all scores). While decrease in scores based on the VAS and FFI in LLLT group was statistically more significant compared to ESWT group (p = 0.014, p = 0.013), there was statistically less significant decrease in scores on the AOFAS in LLLT group than that of ESWT group (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated significant improvements in terms of pain, functional status and daily life activities following the administration of either of the treatments. Furthermore, LLLT was found to be significantly more effective for alleviating pain than ESWT in the treatment of PF.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction - a narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LIEST) for erectile dysfunction (ED), pointing out which concepts are already consolidated and which paths we still need to advance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the literature on the role of shockwave therapies in erectile dysfunction, selecting publications in PUBMED, including only relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. RESULTS: We found 11 studies (7 clinical trials, 3 systematic review and 1 meta-analysis) that evaluated the use of LIEST for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. One clinical trial evaluated the applicability in Peyronie's Disease and one other clinical trial evaluated the applicability after radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The literature presents little scientific evidence but suggests good results with the use of LIEST for ED. Despite a real optimism since it is a treatment modality capable of acting on the pathophysiology of ED, we must remain cautious, until a larger volume of higher quality studies allows us to establish which patient profile, type of energy and application protocol will achieve clinically satisfactory results.

Comparing radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy and corticosteroid injection in the treatment of piriformis syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the effects of shockwave therapy and corticosteroid injection in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this randomized clinical trial, thirty-five patients with piriformis syndrome were randomly divided into two groups of 18 in the shockwave group and 17 in the corticosteroid group. The Shockwave group underwent three sessions of shockwave therapy per week (2000 pulses per session with 5Hz frequency and pressure equal to 4 Bar) and the corticosteroid group underwent an injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine under ultrasound guidance. All patients were assessed by SF-36 questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS). The SF-36 questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life before and 4 weeks after the intervention. VAS scale was used to evaluate pain before the intervention, and 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. At the end of the study, both groups had a significant improvement in pain and quality of life compared to before the intervention. However, according to the VAS, in the shockwave group improvement was seen in the first follow-up while not seen in the corticosteroid group (P-value <0.001 and P-value 1.00, respectively). According to the SF-36 questionnaire, the overall score in both groups had a significant improvement (P-value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It seems that shockwave therapy and corticosteroid injection are both effective in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the quarterly follow-up. Because shockwave therapy is a relatively non-invasive treatment with fewer side effects, it can be useful to improve pain and the quality of life of patients with piriformis syndrome.

Experiencia en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Dupuytren con ondas de choque radiales: estudio de caso / Experience in the treatment of Dupuytren's disease with radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy: A case report

Introducción y objetivos La enfermedad de Dupuytren (ED) es un trastorno proliferativo benigno que afecta a la aponeurosis palmar y dedos en la mano. Los tratamientos propuestos son en su mayoría invasivos y presentan recurrencias. Se ha postulado la utilización de ondas de choque para el manejo de esta enfermedad dado su bajo costo, además de ser una técnica no invasiva. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir una experiencia terapéutica en el manejo de la ED utilizando ondas de choque radiales (OCr). Material y métod Mujer de 72 años, presenta tejido fibroso retráctil en la palma de ambas manos asociado al dedo meñique, manifestando dolor a la presión y limitación severa de la movilidad en extensión. Se evaluó la intensidad de dolor al reposo y al movimiento, umbral de dolor a la presión, movilidad, fuerza prensil, discapacidad y severidad de la ED. Se realizaron 6 sesiones de OCr distribuidas en 4 semanas, utilizando 2000 pulsos a 14Hz y 1,4bar, para luego seguir con 2000 pulsos a 6Hz y 3,4bar. Resultados: Se evidenciaron mínimas mejorías en todas las variables evaluadas. Estas no generaron una diferencia mínima clínicamente importante. Conclusión Basado en esta experiencia, las OCr no produjeron un cambio clínico relevante en el tratamiento de la ED en estadio avanzado. Es necesario profundizar en la eficacia de esta técnica considerando el tipo de ondas de choque que se utiliza, así como una estadificación variada que permita evidenciar los efectos según la severidad de la ED (AU)

Background and objectives Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a benign proliferative disorder that affects the palmar aponeurosis and fingers. Current treatments are mostly invasive and have recurrences. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy has been proposed for the management of this disease, given its low cost, in addition to being a non-invasive technique. The aim of this study is present a therapeutic experience in DD using radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rESWT). Material and method A 72-year-old woman presented in both hands a band of palmar fibrous tissue associated with the little finger, manifesting pain on pressure and severe limitation of extension. Pain intensity at rest and movement, pressure pain threshold, mobility, grip strength, disability, and severity of DD were evaluated. Six sessions of rESWT were performed distributed over 4 weeks using 2000 pulses at 14Hz and 1.4bar followed by 2000 pulses at 6Hz and 3.4bar. Results Minimal improvements were evidenced in all the variables evaluated. The effect of the intervention was not sufficient to generate a minimal clinically important difference. Conclusion Based on this experience, rESWT did not generate a relevant clinical change in the treatment of advanced-stage DD. It is necessary to inquire into the efficacy of this technique considering the type of extracorporeal shockwave used, as well as a varied staging that allows evidence the effects of radial shockwaves according to the severity of disease (AU)